7UQT

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
2 2D 1H-13C HSQC 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
3 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
4 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
5 2D 1H-1H COSY 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
6 2D 1H-1H NOESY 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
11 3D HBHA(CO)NH 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
10 3D HNCACB 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
9 3D HNCO 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
8 3D HCCH-TOCSY 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
7 3D HCCH-COSY 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
16 3D 1H-13C NOESY 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
15 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
14 3D 1H-15N NOESY 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
13 2D HBCBCGCDHD 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
12 2D HBCBCGCDCEHE 250 uM [U-13C; U-15N] 6H-QseM, 20 mM sodium chloride, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 24 2 % v/v glycerol, 98 % v/v D2O 7.5 1 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE III 800
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
torsion angle dynamics CYANA was provided with a list of 680 chemical shift assignments, 1177 distance and 124 torsion angle restraints. Initial structure calculations were performed using a family of 100 structures each running for 10,000 steps of torsion angle dynamics. The 20 lowest energy structures were used for subsequent water refinement via the RECOORD method (Nederveen et al., 2005) with 500 annealing runs. The lowest energy 100 structures after annealing were refined in water with the 20 lowest energy structures creating the final ensemble 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria all calculated structures submitted
Conformers Calculated Total Number 20
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (medoid)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement ? CYANA Guntert P. Mumenthaler C. Wuthrich K.
2 structure calculation ? CYANA Guntert P. Mumenthaler C. Wuthrich K.
3 chemical shift assignment ? CcpNmr Analysis Vranken W.F. Boucher W. Stevens T.J. Fogh R.H. Pajon A. Llinas M. Ulrich E.L. Markley J.L. Ionides J. Laue E.D.
4 peak picking ? CcpNmr Analysis Vranken W.F. Boucher W. Stevens T.J. Fogh R.H. Pajon A. Llinas M. Ulrich E.L. Markley J.L. Ionides J. Laue E.D.