9QUO image
Deposition Date 2025-04-10
Release Date 2025-11-19
Last Version Date 2025-11-19
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
9QUO
Keywords:
Title:
Co(II)-bound de novo protein scaffold TFD-EH T87E
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
1.95 Å
R-Value Free:
0.21
R-Value Work:
0.18
R-Value Observed:
0.19
Space Group:
P 31 2 1
Macromolecular Entities
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:TFD-EH T87E
Chain IDs:A
Chain Length:172
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:synthetic construct
Primary Citation
Modular protein scaffold architecture and AI-guided sequence optimization facilitate de novo metalloenzyme engineering.
Structure ? ? ? (2025)
PMID: 41197620 DOI: 10.1016/j.str.2025.10.010

Abstact

Incorporating metal cofactors into computationally designed protein scaffolds provides a versatile route to novel protein functions, including the potential for new-to-nature enzyme catalysis. However, a major challenge in protein design is to understand how the scaffold architecture influences conformational dynamics. Here, we characterized structure and dynamics of a modular de novo scaffold with flexible inter-domain linkers. Three rationally engineered variants with different metal specificity were studied by combining X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and molecular dynamics simulations. The lanthanide-binding variant was initially trapped in an inactive conformational state, which impaired efficient metal coordination and cerium-dependent photocatalytic activity. Stabilization of the active conformation by AI-guided sequence optimization using ProteinMPNN led to accelerated lanthanide binding and a 10-fold increase in kcat/Km for a photoenzymatic model reaction. Our results suggest that modular scaffold architectures provide an attractive starting point for de novo metalloenzyme engineering and that ProteinMPNN-based sequence redesign can stabilize desired conformational states.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback