9L42 image
Deposition Date 2024-12-19
Release Date 2025-10-22
Last Version Date 2025-10-22
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
9L42
Title:
Cryo-EM structure of human histamine receptor H4R in complex with agonist histamine and Gi proteins
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Host Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
2.90 Å
Aggregation State:
PARTICLE
Reconstruction Method:
SINGLE PARTICLE
Macromolecular Entities
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Histamine receptor H4R
Chain IDs:A
Chain Length:312
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:Homo sapiens
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(i) subunit alpha-1
Gene (Uniprot):GNAI1
Mutagens:S47N/G203A/E245A/A326S
Chain IDs:B
Chain Length:354
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:Homo sapiens
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(T) subunit beta-1
Gene (Uniprot):GNB1
Chain IDs:C
Chain Length:354
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:Homo sapiens
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Guanine nucleotide-binding protein G(I)/G(S)/G(O) subunit gamma-2
Gene (Uniprot):GNG2
Chain IDs:D
Chain Length:81
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:Homo sapiens
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Antibody fragment scFv16
Chain IDs:E
Chain Length:292
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:synthetic construct
Primary Citation
Cryo-EM Structures and AlphaFold3 Models of Histamine Receptors Reveal Diverse Ligand Binding and G Protein Bias.
Pharmaceuticals 18 ? ? (2025)
PMID: 40143071 DOI: 10.3390/ph18030292

Abstact

Background: The four subtypes of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) regulated by histamine play critical roles in various physiological and pathological processes, such as allergy, gastric acid secretion, cognitive and sleep disorders, and inflammation. Previous experimental structures of histamine receptors (HRs) with agonists and antagonists exhibited multiple conformations for the ligands and G protein binding. However, the structural basis for HR regulation and signaling remains elusive. Methods: We determined the cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) structure of the H4R-histamine-Gi complex at 2.9 Å resolution, and predicted the models for all four HRs in the ligand-free apo and G protein subtype binding states using AlphaFold3 (AF3). Results: By comparing our H4R structure with the experimental HR structures and the computational AF3 models, we elucidated the distinct histamine binding modes and G protein interfaces, and proposed the essential roles of Y6.51 and Q7.42 in receptor activation and the intracellular loop 2 (ICL2) in G protein bias. Conclusions: Our findings deciphered the molecular mechanisms underlying the regulation of different HRs, from the extracellular ligand-binding pockets and transmembrane motifs to the intracellular G protein coupling interfaces. These insights are expected to facilitate selective drug discovery targeting HRs for diverse therapeutic purposes.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures