8C3E image
Deposition Date 2022-12-23
Release Date 2023-04-12
Last Version Date 2025-07-23
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
8C3E
Title:
Engineered mini-protein LCB2 (blocking ligand of SARS-Cov-2 spike protein)
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
2.10 Å
R-Value Free:
0.24
R-Value Work:
0.20
R-Value Observed:
0.22
Space Group:
P 31 2 1
Macromolecular Entities
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Engineered protein LCB2
Chain IDs:A
Chain Length:58
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:synthetic construct
Ligand Molecules
Primary Citation
Using multiple computer-predicted structures as molecular replacement models: application to the antiviral mini-protein LCB2.
Iucrj 12 488 501 (2025)
PMID: 40549150 DOI: 10.1107/S2052252525005123

Abstact

In this report, we describe a set of structures of the engineered protein LCB2 that has been solved starting from different computer-predicted molecular replacement (MR) models. We found that AlphaFold3, AlphaFold2, MultiFOLD, Rosetta, RoseTTAFold and trRosetta all produced successful MR models for this three-helix bundle 58-residue protein, while some of the older predictors failed. To assign B factors in the MR models we used the predictor-generated confidence scores or, as a convenient alternative, the accessible surface area (ASA) values. The process of multi-start structure determination using Coot and Phenix demonstrated good convergence, leading to six structures within 0.25 Å (all-atom RMSD) of each other. Of note, structural differences between the computer-predicted MR models and the final structures can be largely attributed to a single specific crystal contact. Comparing the six structural solutions, we observe that a number of surface side chains have been solved with different conformations. Interestingly, for each individual structure the electron density is consistent with a single rotameric state and offers no direct evidence of conformational heterogeneity. Strictly speaking, this behavior constitutes a case of model bias; we argue, however, that it represents a benign side of model bias. Specifically, when we use a model where the side-chain conformation corresponds to one of the actual (significantly populated) rotameric states, this leads to an enhancement of the electron density for this particular conformation. Conversely, when we use a model with an irrelevant (low-population) side-chain conformation, it fails to produce the matching electron density. We thus conclude that the six LCB2 structures obtained in this study can be grouped into a multiconformer ensemble, where structural variations are representative of protein's conformational dynamics. Indeed, using this six-member ensemble leads to a significant drop in Rwork and Rfree compared with the individual solutions. This interpretation was also supported by our MD simulations of the LCB2 crystal.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures