6PD1 image
Deposition Date 2019-06-18
Release Date 2019-08-07
Last Version Date 2024-12-25
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
6PD1
Title:
PntC-AEPT: fusion protein of phosphonate-specific cytidylyltransferase and 2-aminoethylphosphonate (AEP) transaminase from Treponema denticola
Biological Source:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
2.72 Å
R-Value Free:
0.23
R-Value Work:
0.19
R-Value Observed:
0.20
Space Group:
P 1 21 1
Macromolecular Entities
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Nucleotidyl transferase/aminotransferase, class V
Gene (Uniprot):pntC
Chain IDs:A, B, C, D
Chain Length:624
Number of Molecules:4
Biological Source:Treponema denticola (strain ATCC 35405 / CIP 103919 / DSM 14222)
Primary Citation
The predominance of nucleotidyl activation in bacterial phosphonate biosynthesis.
Nat Commun 10 3698 3698 (2019)
PMID: 31420548 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-019-11627-6

Abstact

Phosphonates are rare and unusually bioactive natural products. However, most bacterial phosphonate biosynthetic capacity is dedicated to tailoring cell surfaces with molecules like 2-aminoethylphosphonate (AEP). Although phosphoenolpyruvate mutase (Ppm)-catalyzed installation of C-P bonds is known, subsequent phosphonyl tailoring (Pnt) pathway steps remain enigmatic. Here we identify nucleotidyltransferases in over two-thirds of phosphonate biosynthetic gene clusters, including direct fusions to ~60% of Ppm enzymes. We characterize two putative phosphonyl tailoring cytidylyltransferases (PntCs) that prefer AEP over phosphocholine (P-Cho) - a similar substrate used by the related enzyme LicC, which is a virulence factor in Streptococcus pneumoniae. PntC structural analyses reveal steric discrimination against phosphocholine. These findings highlight nucleotidyl activation as a predominant chemical logic in phosphonate biosynthesis and set the stage for probing diverse phosphonyl tailoring pathways.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback