6MAC image
Deposition Date 2018-08-27
Release Date 2019-07-17
Last Version Date 2024-11-06
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
6MAC
Title:
Ternary structure of GDF11 bound to ActRIIB-ECD and Alk5-ECD
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Homo sapiens (Taxon ID: 9606)
Rattus norvegicus (Taxon ID: 10116)
Host Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
2.34 Å
R-Value Free:
0.26
R-Value Work:
0.22
R-Value Observed:
0.22
Space Group:
P 32 1 2
Macromolecular Entities
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Growth/differentiation factor 11
Gene (Uniprot):GDF11
Chain IDs:A
Chain Length:108
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:Homo sapiens
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Activin receptor type-2B
Gene (Uniprot):Acvr2b
Chain IDs:B (auth: C)
Chain Length:95
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:Rattus norvegicus
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:TGF-beta receptor type-1
Gene (Uniprot):TGFBR1
Chain IDs:C (auth: K)
Chain Length:80
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:Homo sapiens
Ligand Molecules
Primary Citation
Structural characterization of an activin class ternary receptor complex reveals a third paradigm for receptor specificity.
Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 116 15505 15513 (2019)
PMID: 31315975 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1906253116

Abstact

TGFβ family ligands, which include the TGFβs, BMPs, and activins, signal by forming a ternary complex with type I and type II receptors. For TGFβs and BMPs, structures of ternary complexes have revealed differences in receptor assembly. However, structural information for how activins assemble a ternary receptor complex is lacking. We report the structure of an activin class member, GDF11, in complex with the type II receptor ActRIIB and the type I receptor Alk5. The structure reveals that receptor positioning is similar to the BMP class, with no interreceptor contacts; however, the type I receptor interactions are shifted toward the ligand fingertips and away from the dimer interface. Mutational analysis shows that ligand type I specificity is derived from differences in the fingertips of the ligands that interact with an extended loop specific to Alk4 and Alk5. The study also reveals differences for how TGFβ and GDF11 bind to the same type I receptor, Alk5. For GDF11, additional contacts at the fingertip region substitute for the interreceptor interactions that are seen for TGFβ, indicating that Alk5 binding to GDF11 is more dependent on direct contacts. In support, we show that a single residue of Alk5 (Phe84), when mutated, abolishes GDF11 signaling, but has little impact on TGFβ signaling. The structure of GDF11/ActRIIB/Alk5 shows that, across the TGFβ family, different mechanisms regulate type I receptor binding and specificity, providing a molecular explanation for how the activin class accommodates low-affinity type I interactions without the requirement of cooperative receptor interactions.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback