6IAL image
Deposition Date 2018-11-27
Release Date 2019-02-27
Last Version Date 2024-11-13
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
6IAL
Keywords:
Title:
Porcine E.coli heat-labile enterotoxin B-pentamer in complex with Lacto-N-neohexaose
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Escherichia coli (Taxon ID: 562)
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
1.45 Å
R-Value Free:
0.20
R-Value Work:
0.17
R-Value Observed:
0.17
Space Group:
P 1 21 1
Macromolecular Entities
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Heat-labile enterotoxin B chain
Gene (Uniprot):eltB
Chain IDs:A (auth: D), B (auth: E), C (auth: F), D (auth: G), E (auth: H), F (auth: A), G (auth: B), H (auth: C), I, J
Chain Length:103
Number of Molecules:10
Biological Source:Escherichia coli
Primary Citation
Specificity ofEscherichia coliHeat-Labile Enterotoxin Investigated by Single-Site Mutagenesis and Crystallography.
Int J Mol Sci 20 ? ? (2019)
PMID: 30736336 DOI: 10.3390/ijms20030703

Abstact

Diarrhea caused by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) is one of the leading causes of mortality in children under five years of age and is a great burden on developing countries. The major virulence factor of the bacterium is the heat-labile enterotoxin (LT), a close homologue of the cholera toxin. The toxins bind to carbohydrate receptors in the gastrointestinal tract, leading to toxin uptake and, ultimately, to severe diarrhea. Previously, LT from human- and porcine-infecting ETEC (hLT and pLT, respectively) were shown to have different carbohydrate-binding specificities, in particular with respect to N-acetyllactosamine-terminating glycosphingolipids. Here, we probed 11 single-residue variants of the heat-labile enterotoxin with surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy and compared the data to the parent toxins. In addition we present a 1.45 Å crystal structure of pLTB in complex with branched lacto-N-neohexaose (Galβ4GlcNAcβ6[Galβ4GlcNAcβ3]Galβ4Glc). The largest difference in binding specificity is caused by mutation of residue 94, which links the primary and secondary binding sites of the toxins. Residue 95 (and to a smaller extent also residues 7 and 18) also contribute, whereas residue 4 shows no effect on monovalent binding of the ligand and may rather be important for multivalent binding and avidity.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures