5URA image
Deposition Date 2017-02-09
Release Date 2017-08-23
Last Version Date 2023-10-04
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
5URA
Title:
Enantiomer-Specific Binding of the Potent Antinociceptive Agent SBFI-26 to Anandamide transporters FABP7
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Homo sapiens (Taxon ID: 9606)
Host Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
1.85 Å
R-Value Free:
0.20
R-Value Work:
0.17
R-Value Observed:
0.18
Space Group:
P 1 21 1
Macromolecular Entities
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Fatty acid-binding protein, brain
Gene (Uniprot):FABP7
Chain IDs:A, B, C, D
Chain Length:135
Number of Molecules:4
Biological Source:Homo sapiens
Primary Citation
The Antinociceptive Agent SBFI-26 Binds to Anandamide Transporters FABP5 and FABP7 at Two Different Sites.
Biochemistry 56 3454 3462 (2017)
PMID: 28632393 DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.7b00194

Abstact

Human FABP5 and FABP7 are intracellular endocannabinoid transporters. SBFI-26 is an α-truxillic acid 1-naphthyl monoester that competitively inhibits the activities of FABP5 and FABP7 and produces antinociceptive and anti-inflammatory effects in mice. The synthesis of SBFI-26 yields several stereoisomers, and it is not known how the inhibitor binds the transporters. Here we report co-crystal structures of SBFI-26 in complex with human FABP5 and FABP7 at 2.2 and 1.9 Å resolution, respectively. We found that only (S)-SBFI-26 was present in the crystal structures. The inhibitor largely mimics the fatty acid binding pattern, but it also has several unique interactions. Notably, the FABP7 complex corroborates key aspects of the ligand binding pose at the canonical site previously predicted by virtual screening. In FABP5, SBFI-26 was unexpectedly found to bind at the substrate entry portal region in addition to binding at the canonical ligand-binding pocket. Our structural and binding energy analyses indicate that both R and S forms appear to bind the transporter equally well. We suggest that the S enantiomer observed in the crystal structures may be a result of the crystallization process selectively incorporating the (S)-SBFI-26-FABP complexes into the growing lattice, or that the S enantiomer may bind to the portal site more rapidly than to the canonical site, leading to an increased local concentration of the S enantiomer for binding to the canonical site. Our work reveals two binding poses of SBFI-26 in its target transporters. This knowledge will guide the development of more potent FABP inhibitors based upon the SBFI-26 scaffold.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures