5L35 image
Deposition Date 2016-08-03
Release Date 2017-03-22
Last Version Date 2024-03-06
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
5L35
Keywords:
Title:
Cryo-EM structure of bacteriophage Sf6 at 2.9 Angstrom resolution
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
2.89 Å
Aggregation State:
PARTICLE
Reconstruction Method:
SINGLE PARTICLE
Macromolecular Entities
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Gene 5 protein
Gene (Uniprot):5
Chain IDs:A, B, C, D, E, F, G
Chain Length:422
Number of Molecules:7
Biological Source:Shigella phage Sf6
Ligand Molecules
Primary Citation
Structure of a headful DNA-packaging bacterial virus at 2.9 angstrom resolution by electron cryo-microscopy.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 114 3601 3606 (2017)
PMID: 28320961 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615025114

Abstact

The enormous prevalence of tailed DNA bacteriophages on this planet is enabled by highly efficient self-assembly of hundreds of protein subunits into highly stable capsids. These capsids can stand with an internal pressure as high as ∼50 atmospheres as a result of the phage DNA-packaging process. Here we report the complete atomic model of the headful DNA-packaging bacteriophage Sf6 at 2.9 Å resolution determined by electron cryo-microscopy. The structure reveals the DNA-inflated, tensed state of a robust protein shell assembled via noncovalent interactions. Remarkable global conformational polymorphism of capsid proteins, a network formed by extended N arms, mortise-and-tenon-like intercapsomer joints, and abundant β-sheet-like mainchain:mainchain intermolecular interactions, confers significant strength yet also flexibility required for capsid assembly and DNA packaging. Differential formations of the hexon and penton are mediated by a drastic α-helix-to-β-strand structural transition. The assembly scheme revealed here may be common among tailed DNA phages and herpesviruses.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback