4UEH image
Deposition Date 2014-12-17
Release Date 2015-08-26
Last Version Date 2024-10-23
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
4UEH
Keywords:
Title:
Thrombin in complex with benzamidine
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
HIRUDO MEDICINALIS (Taxon ID: 6421)
HOMO SAPIENS (Taxon ID: 9606)
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
1.16 Å
R-Value Free:
0.13
R-Value Work:
0.12
R-Value Observed:
0.12
Space Group:
C 1 2 1
Macromolecular Entities
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:THROMBIN HEAVY CHAIN
Gene (Uniprot):F2
Chain IDs:A (auth: H)
Chain Length:258
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:HOMO SAPIENS
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:HIRUDIN VARIANT-2
Chain IDs:B (auth: I)
Chain Length:12
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:HIRUDO MEDICINALIS
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:THROMBIN LIGHT CHAIN
Gene (Uniprot):F2
Chain IDs:C (auth: L)
Chain Length:29
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:HOMO SAPIENS
Modified Residue
Compound ID Chain ID Parent Comp ID Details 2D Image
ASN A ASN GLYCOSYLATION SITE
TYS B TYR O-SULFO-L-TYROSINE
Primary Citation
Fragments Can Bind Either More Enthalpy or Entropy-Driven: Crystal Structures and Residual Hydration Pattern Suggest Why.
J.Med.Chem. 58 6960 ? (2015)
PMID: 26270568 DOI: 10.1021/ACS.JMEDCHEM.5B00812

Abstact

In lead optimization, small, enthalpically advantaged fragments have been suggested to be superior, as an entropic component will be added inevitably during late-stage optimization. Determination of thermodynamic signatures of weak-binding fragments is essential to support the decision-making process, to decide which fragment to take to further optimization. High-resolution crystal structures of six fragments binding to the S1 pocket of thrombin were determined and analyzed with respect to their thermodynamic profile. The two most potent fragments exhibiting an amidine-type scaffold are not the most enthalpic binders; instead a chloro-thiophene fragment binds more enthalpically. Two chemically very similar chloro-aromatic fragments differ strongly in their potency (430 μM vs 10 mM); their binding modes are related, but the surrounding residual water network differs. The more potent one recruits a water molecule and involves Glu192 in binding, thus succeeding in firmly capping the S1 pocket. Fragments exhibiting a rather perfect solvation pattern in their binding mode also experience the highest potency.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback