4PKO image
Deposition Date 2014-05-15
Release Date 2014-08-20
Last Version Date 2024-10-09
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
4PKO
Keywords:
Title:
Crystal structure of the Football-shaped GroEL-GroES2-(ADPBeFx)14 complex
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Escherichia coli (Taxon ID: 562)
Host Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
3.84 Å
R-Value Free:
0.24
R-Value Work:
0.18
R-Value Observed:
0.18
Space Group:
P 21 21 21
Macromolecular Entities
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:60 kDa chaperonin
Gene (Uniprot):groL
Chain IDs:A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M, N
Chain Length:548
Number of Molecules:14
Biological Source:Escherichia coli
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:10 kDa chaperonin
Gene (Uniprot):groS
Chain IDs:O, P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W, X, Y, Z, AA (auth: 1), BA (auth: 2)
Chain Length:97
Number of Molecules:14
Biological Source:Escherichia coli
Primary Citation
Formation and structures of GroEL:GroES2 chaperonin footballs, the protein-folding functional form.
Proc.Natl.Acad.Sci.USA 111 12775 12780 (2014)
PMID: 25136110 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1412922111

Abstact

The GroE chaperonins assist substrate protein (SP) folding by cycling through several conformational states. With each cycle the SP is, in turn, captured, unfolded, briefly encapsulated (t1/2 ∼ 1 s), and released by the chaperonin complex. The protein-folding functional form is the US-football-shaped GroEL:GroES2 complex. We report structures of two such "football" complexes to ∼ 3.7-Å resolution; one is empty whereas the other contains encapsulated SP in both chambers. Although encapsulated SP is not visible on the electron density map, using calibrated FRET and order-of-addition experiments we show that owing to SP-catalyzed ADP/ATP exchange both chambers of the football complex encapsulate SP efficiently only if the binding of SP precedes that of ATP. The two rings of GroEL thus behave as a parallel processing machine, rather than functioning alternately. Compared with the bullet-shaped GroEL:GroES1 complex, the GroEL:GroES2 football complex differs conformationally at the GroEL-GroES interface and also at the interface between the two GroEL rings. We propose that the electrostatic interactions between the ε-NH(3+) of K105 of helix D in one ring with the negatively charged carboxyl oxygen of A109 at the carboxyl end of helix D of the other ring provide the structural basis for negative inter-ring cooperativity.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures