4I7M image
Deposition Date 2012-11-30
Release Date 2013-03-27
Last Version Date 2023-09-20
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
4I7M
Keywords:
Title:
T4 Lysozyme L99A/M102H with 2-allylphenol bound
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Host Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
1.48 Å
R-Value Free:
0.19
R-Value Work:
0.17
R-Value Observed:
0.17
Space Group:
P 1 21 1
Macromolecular Entities
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:Lysozyme
Gene (Uniprot):E
Mutations:T21C, S38D, L99A, M102H, E108V, S117V, T142C, N144D
Chain IDs:A, B
Chain Length:187
Number of Molecules:2
Biological Source:Enterobacteria phage T4
Primary Citation
The impact of introducing a histidine into an apolar cavity site on docking and ligand recognition.
J.Med.Chem. 56 2874 2884 (2013)
PMID: 23473072 DOI: 10.1021/jm301823g

Abstact

Simplified model binding sites allow one to isolate entangled terms in molecular energy functions. Here, we investigate the effects on ligand recognition of the introduction of a histidine into a hydrophobic cavity in lysozyme. We docked 656040 molecules and tested 26 highly and nine poorly ranked. Twenty-one highly ranked molecules bound and five were false positives, while three poorly ranked molecules were false negatives. In the 16 X-ray complexes now known, the docking predictions overlaid well with the crystallographic results. Although ligand enrichment was high, the false negatives, the false positives, and the inability to rank order illuminated weaknesses in our scoring, particularly overweighed apolar and underweighted polar terms. Adjusting these led to new problems, reflecting the entangled nature of docking scoring functions. Changes in ligand affinity relative to other lysozyme cavities speak to the subtleties of molecular recognition even in these simple sites and to their relevance for testing different models of recognition.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures