ISDA

Deposition Date 2003-12-09

Release Date 2004-01-15

Last Version Date 2024-11-13

Entry Detail

PDB ID:

1UTP

Keywords:

HYDROLASE

Title:

Trypsin specificity as elucidated by LIE calculations, X-ray structures and association constant measurements

Biological Source:

Source Organism:

BOS TAURUS (Taxon ID: 9913)

Method Details:

Experimental Method:

X-RAY DIFFRACTION

Resolution:

1.30 Å

R-Value Free:

0.18

R-Value Observed:

0.14

Space Group:

P 31 2 1

Download Validation Report

Macromolecular Entities

Protein Blast

Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:TRYPSINOGEN
Gene (Uniprot):PRSS1
Chain IDs:A
Chain Length:243
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:BOS TAURUS

UniProt ID:P00760 Pfam ID:PF00089 EC:3.4.21.4

Ligand Molecules

GOL

PBN

Primary Citation

Trypsin Specificity as Elucidated by Lie Calculations, X-Ray Structures, and Association Constant Measurements

Leiros, H.-K.S, Brandsdal, B.O, Andersen, O.A, Os, V, Leiros, I, Helland, R, Otlewski, J, Willassen, N.P, Smalas, A.O.Show

Protein Sci. 13 1056 ? (2004)

PMID: 15044735 DOI: 10.1110/PS.03498604

Abstact

The variation in inhibitor specificity for five different amine inhibitors bound to CST, BT, and the cold-adapted AST has been studied by use of association constant measurements, structural analysis of high-resolution crystal structures, and the LIE method. Experimental data show that AST binds the 1BZA and 2BEA inhibitors 0.8 and 0.5 kcal/mole more strongly than BT. However, structural interactions and orientations of the inhibitors within the S1 site have been found to be virtually identical in the three enzymes studied. For example, the four water molecules in the inhibitor-free structures of AST and BT are channeled into similar positions in the S1 site, and the nitrogen atom(s) of the inhibitors are found in two cationic binding sites denoted Position1 and Position2. The hydrophobic binding contributions for all five inhibitors, estimated by the LIE calculations, are also in the same order (-2.1 +/- 0.2 kcal/mole) for all three enzymes. Our hypothesis is therefore that the observed variation in inhibitor binding arises from different electrostatic interactions originating from residues outside the S1 site. This is well illustrated by AST, in which Asp 150 and Glu 221B, despite some distance from the S1 binding site, lower the electrostatic potential of the S1 site and thus enhance substrate binding. Because the trends in the experimentally determined binding energies were reproduced by the LIE calculations after adding the contribution from long-range interactions, we find this method very suitable for rational studies of protein-substrate interactions.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures