1CQU image
Deposition Date 1999-08-11
Release Date 2002-04-27
Last Version Date 2024-05-22
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
1CQU
Keywords:
Title:
SOLUTION STRUCTURE OF THE N-TERMINAL DOMAIN OF RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L9
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Conformers Calculated:
50
Conformers Submitted:
18
Selection Criteria:
structures with the least restraint violations
Macromolecular Entities
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:50S RIBOSOMAL PROTEIN L9
Gene (Uniprot):rplI
Chain IDs:A
Chain Length:56
Number of Molecules:1
Biological Source:Geobacillus stearothermophilus
Ligand Molecules
Primary Citation
Effects of varying the local propensity to form secondary structure on the stability and folding kinetics of a rapid folding mixed alpha/beta protein: characterization of a truncation mutant of the N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9.
J.Mol.Biol. 289 167 174 (1999)
PMID: 10339414 DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2742

Abstact

The N-terminal domain of the ribosomal protein L9 forms a split betaalphabeta structure with a long C-terminal helix. The folding transitions of a 56 residue version of this protein have previously been characterized, here we report the results of a study of a truncation mutant corresponding to residues 1-51. The 51 residue protein adopts the same fold as the 56 residue protein as judged by CD and two-dimensional NMR, but it is less stable as judged by chemical and thermal denaturation experiments. Studies with synthetic peptides demonstrate that the C-terminal helix of the 51 residue version has very little propensity to fold in isolation in contrast to the C-terminal helix of the 56 residue variant. The folding rates of the two proteins, as measured by stopped-flow fluorescence, are essentially identical, indicating that formation of local structure in the C-terminal helix is not involved in the rate-limiting step of folding.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback