1BYU image
Deposition Date 1998-10-18
Release Date 1998-12-02
Last Version Date 2024-04-03
Entry Detail
PDB ID:
1BYU
Title:
CANINE GDP-RAN
Biological Source:
Source Organism:
Method Details:
Experimental Method:
Resolution:
2.15 Å
R-Value Free:
0.24
R-Value Work:
0.17
Space Group:
P 1 21 1
Macromolecular Entities
Structures with similar UniProt ID
Protein Blast
Polymer Type:polypeptide(L)
Molecule:PROTEIN (GTP-BINDING PROTEIN RAN)
Gene (Uniprot):RAN
Chain IDs:A, B
Chain Length:216
Number of Molecules:2
Biological Source:Canis lupus familiaris
Primary Citation
The structure of the Q69L mutant of GDP-Ran shows a major conformational change in the switch II loop that accounts for its failure to bind nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2).
J.Mol.Biol. 284 1517 1527 (1998)
PMID: 9878368 DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2204

Abstact

We report the 2.3 A resolution X-ray crystal structure of the GDP-bound form of the RanQ69L mutant that is used extensively in studies of nucleocytoplasmic transport and cell-cycle progression. When the structure of GDP-RanQ69L from monoclinic crystals with P21 symmetry was compared with the structure of wild-type Ran obtained from monoclinic crystals, the Q69L mutant showed a large conformational change in residues 68-74, which are in the switch II region of the molecule which changes conformation in response to nucleotide state and which forms the major interaction interface with nuclear transport factor 2 (NTF2, sometimes called p10). This conformational change alters the positions of key residues such as Lys71, Phe72 and Arg76 that are crucial for the interaction of GDP-Ran with NTF2 and indeed, solution binding studies were unable to detect any interaction between NTF2 and GDP-RanQ69L under conditions where GDP-Ran bound effectively. This interaction between NTF2 and GDP-Ran is required for efficient nuclear protein import and may function between the docking and translocation steps of the pathway.

Legend

Protein

Chemical

Disease

Primary Citation of related structures
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback