SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
2 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
3 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
4 3D HNCACB 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
5 HN(CO)CACB 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
6 3D HCCH-TOCSY 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
7 3D 1H-15N TOCSY 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
8 3D 1H-15N NOESY 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
9 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
10 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic 0.5 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] B domain of protein A, 90% H2O/10% D2O 150 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 288.15
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE III 800
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 3
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 20
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment ? NMRViewJ Johnson
2 structure calculation ? CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
5 structure calculation ? ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
3 refinement ? CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4 peak picking ? NMRViewJ Johnson
6 geometry optimization ? TALOS+ Cornilescu
7 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax