SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-13C HSQC 1.0 mM [U-13C; U-15N] CHASE4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 5 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.2 1 298
2 2D 1H-15N HSQC 1.0 mM [U-13C; U-15N] CHASE4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 5 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.2 1 298
3 3D HNCA 1.0 mM [U-13C; U-15N] CHASE4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 5 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.2 1 298
4 3D HN(CO)CA 1.0 mM [U-13C; U-15N] CHASE4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 5 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.2 1 298
5 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 1.0 mM [U-13C; U-15N] CHASE4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 5 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.2 1 298
7 3D CCH TOCSY 1.0 mM [U-13C; U-15N] CHASE4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 5 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.2 1 298
6 4D 13C,15N-edited NOESY 1.0 mM [U-13C; U-15N] CHASE4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 5 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.2 1 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
distance geometry ? 4
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 data analysis ? NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
2 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
3 structure calculation ? CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
4 refinement ? Amber Case, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback