SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
2 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
3 3D CBCA(CO)NH 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
4 3D HNCA 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
5 3D HNCACB 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
6 2D 1H-15N HSQC 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
10 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
9 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
8 3D C(CO)NH 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
7 3D HBHA(CO)NH 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
11 3D H(CCO)NH 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
12 3D HCCH-TOCSY 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
13 3D 1H-15N NOESY 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
14 2D (HB)CB(CGCDCE)HDH AROMATIC 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
15 2D (HB)CB(CGCD)HD AROMATIC 100 mM MOPS, 50 mM sodium chloride, 2 mM TCEP, 90% H2O/10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 1 308
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 9
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment ? Poky Manthey, I. et al. POKY software tools encapsulating assignment strategies for solution and solid-state protein NMR data. J Struct Biol X 6, 100073 (2022). https://doi.org:10.1016/j.yjsbx.2022.100073
5 chemical shift assignment ? PINE Server Lee, W. et al. I-PINE web server: an integrative probabilistic NMR assignment system for proteins. J Biomol NMR 73, 213-222 (2019). https://doi.org:10.1007/s10858-019-00255-3
6 collection ? TopSpin Bruker Biospin
7 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
2 structure calculation ? PONDEROSA-C/S Lee, W., Stark, J. L. & Markley, J. L. PONDEROSA-C/S: client-server based software package for automated protein 3D structure determination. J Biomol NMR 60, 73-75 (2014). https://doi.org:10.1007/s10858-014-9855-x
8 structure calculation ? X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
9 refinement ? X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
10 structure calculation ? AUDANA Lee, W., Petit, C. M., Cornilescu, G., Stark, J. L. & Markley, J. L. The AUDANA algorithm for automated protein 3D structure determination from NMR NOE data. J Biomol NMR 65, 51-57 (2016). https://doi.org:10.1007/s10858-016-0036-y
11 structure calculation ? TALOS-N Shen, Y. & Bax, A. Protein structural information derived from NMR chemical shift with the neural network program TALOS-N. Methods Mol Biol 1260, 17-32 (2015). https://doi.org:10.1007/978-1-4939-2239-0_2
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback