SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-13C HSQC 0.9 mM DNA (33-MER), 0.28 mM [U 10%-15N]-Ade DNA (33-MER), 0.2 mM [U 10%-15N]-Gua DNA (33-MER), 90% H2O/10% D2O 120 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.1 1 298
2 2D 1H-1H NOESY 0.9 mM DNA (33-MER), 0.28 mM [U 10%-15N]-Ade DNA (33-MER), 0.2 mM [U 10%-15N]-Gua DNA (33-MER), 90% H2O/10% D2O 120 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.1 1 298
3 2D 1H-1H COSY 0.9 mM DNA (33-MER), 0.28 mM [U 10%-15N]-Ade DNA (33-MER), 0.2 mM [U 10%-15N]-Gua DNA (33-MER), 90% H2O/10% D2O 120 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.1 1 298
4 1H-15N HMQC 0.9 mM DNA (33-MER), 0.28 mM [U 10%-15N]-Ade DNA (33-MER), 0.2 mM [U 10%-15N]-Gua DNA (33-MER), 90% H2O/10% D2O 120 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.1 1 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE NEO 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 3
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 10
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment 2.4.2 CcpNmr Analysis CCPN
2 structure calculation 18 Amber Case, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
3 refinement 18 Amber Case, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
4 peak picking 2.4.2 CcpNmr Analysis CCPN
5 processing 4.0.7 TopSpin Bruker Biospin