X-RAY DIFFRACTION

Crystallization Details
Method pH Temprature Details
X-RAY DIFFRACTION 4.6 292 Protein: 4.7mg/ml (nsp10/nsp16 1:1), 0.15M Sodium chloride, 0.01M Tris pH 7.5 , 2mM SAM, 1mM TCEP, 5% Glycerol; Screen: Anions (E6), 0.1M Sodium acetate pH 4.6, 0.5M Sodium succinate; Soak: 17 hours, 0.2mM [M7Gppp]rArUrUrArArA, 5mM SAM, 5mM Manganese chloride, Cryo: 4M Sodium formate.
Unit Cell:
a: 167.238 Å b: 167.238 Å c: 98.867 Å α: 90.000° β: 90.000° γ: 120.000°
Symmetry:
Space Group: P 32 2 1
Crystal Properties:
Matthew's Coefficient: 3.92 Solvent Content: 68.63
Refinement Statistics
Diffraction ID Structure Solution Method Cross Validation Method Resolution Limit (High) Resolution Limit (Low) Number of Reflections (Observed) Number of Reflections (R-free) Percent Reflections (Observed) R-Work R-Free Mean Isotropic
X-RAY DIFFRACTION MOLECULAR REPLACEMENT THROUGHOUT 2.1500 30.0000 81799 4338 99.8100 0.1745 0.1981 55.8750
Data Collection
Overall
Resolution Limit (High) Resolution Limit (Low) Percent Possible (Observed) R Merge I (Observed) R Sym I (Observed) Net I Over Average Sigma (I) Redundancy Number Reflections (All) Number Reflections (Observed) Observed Criterion Sigma (F) Observed Criterion Sigma (I) B (Isotropic) From Wilson Plot
2.15 50.0 100.0 0.090 0.090 26.6 7.1 ? 86204 ? -3.0 42.2
Highest Resolution Shell
# Resolution Limits (Low) Resolution Limits (High) Percent Possible (All) Percent Possible (Observed) R-Sym I (Observed) Mean I Over Sigma (Observed) Redundancy Number Unique Reflections (All)
1 2.15 2.19 100.0 ? 1.239 1.8 7.1 ?
Diffraction
Diffraction experiment
Crystal ID Scattering Type Data Collection Temprature Detector Detector Type Details Collection Date Monochromator Protocol
1 100 K ?
Radiation Source
Source Type Wavelength List Synchrotron Site Beamline
SYNCHROTRON APS BEAMLINE 21-ID-F 0.97872 APS 21-ID-F
Software
Software Name Purpose Version
REFMAC refinement 5.8.0266
PDB_EXTRACT data extraction 3.25
HKL-3000 data reduction .
HKL-3000 data scaling .
PHASER phasing .
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback