SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D HNCO 80.13 6.4 1 298
2 3D HN(CO)CA 80.13 6.4 1 298
3 3D HNCA 80.13 6.4 1 298
4 3D CBCA(CO)NH 80.13 6.4 1 298
5 3D HNCACB 80.13 6.4 1 298
6 3D H(CCO)NH 80.13 6.4 1 298
7 2D 1H-1H NOESY 225 uM [U-15N] TubR, 25 mM potassium phosphate, 50 mM potassium chloride, 2 mM D-10 DTT, 90% H2O/10% D2O 80.13 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.4 1 298
9 2D 1H-15N HSQC 80.13 6.4 1 298
8 2D 1H-13C HSQC 80.13 6.4 1 298
10 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 80.13 6.4 1 298
11 3D C(CO)NH 80.13 6.4 1 298
12 3D HCCH-TOCSY 80.13 6.4 1 298
13 3D HCCH-TOCSY 80.13 6.4 1 298
14 3D 1H-15N NOESY 225 uM [U-15N] TubR, 25 mM potassium phosphate, 50 mM potassium chloride, 2 mM D-10 DTT, 90% H2O/10% D2O 80.13 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.4 1 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 150
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (medoid)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection ? TopSpin Bruker Biospin
2 data analysis ? CARA Keller and Wuthrich
3 chemical shift assignment ? CARA Keller and Wuthrich
4 peak picking ? CARA Keller and Wuthrich
5 structure calculation ? CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6 refinement ? MolProbity Richardson
7 geometry optimization ? MolProbity Richardson
8 processing ? TopSpin Bruker Biospin
9 refinement ? Amber Case, Darden, Cheatham III, Simmerling, Wang, Duke, Luo, ... and Kollman
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback