6Q08

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 1 mM synoeca, 100 mM [U-98% 2H] SDS-D25, 5 % v/v [U-98% 2H] DSS, 90 % v/v H2O, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O neutal 90% H2O/10% D2O 7 1 298
2 2D 1H-1H NOESY 1 mM synoeca, 100 mM [U-98% 2H] SDS-D25, 5 % v/v [U-98% 2H] DSS, 90 % v/v H2O, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O neutal 90% H2O/10% D2O 7 1 298
3 2D 1H-13C HSQC 1 mM synoeca, 100 mM [U-98% 2H] SDS-D25, 5 % v/v [U-98% 2H] DSS, 90 % v/v H2O, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O neutal 90% H2O/10% D2O 7 1 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE 500
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing In the final structure calculation of synoeca-MP, 176 unique NOEs and 24 dihedral angles were used as restraints 4
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment ? NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
2 structure calculation ? X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
3 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4 refinement ? X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
5 geometry optimization ? TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax