SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-1H NOESY 0.4 mM polydeoxyribonucleotide, 1.2 mM MERCURY (II) ION, 100% D2O 50 100% D2O 7.35 ambient 298
2 2D 1H-1H COSY 0.4 mM polydeoxyribonucleotide, 1.2 mM MERCURY (II) ION, 100% D2O 50 100% D2O 7.35 ambient 298
3 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 0.4 mM polydeoxyribonucleotide, 1.2 mM MERCURY (II) ION, 100% D2O 50 100% D2O 7.35 ambient 298
4 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic 0.4 mM polydeoxyribonucleotide, 1.2 mM MERCURY (II) ION, 100% D2O 50 100% D2O 7.35 ambient 298
5 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 0.4 mM polydeoxyribonucleotide, 1.2 mM MERCURY (II) ION, 100% D2O 50 100% D2O 7.35 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing 2000 preliminary structures were calculated. The 20 lowest energy structures were subsequently refined. From the 200 calculated refined conformers the 20 lowest energy structures were chosen 2
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (fewest violations)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 peak picking ? Sparky Goddard
2 refinement 2.46 Xplor-NIH G. Marius Clore, Guillermo Bermejo, John Kuszewski, Charles D. Schwieters, and Nico Tjandra
5 collection 4.0.0.b.16 TopSpin Bruker Biospin
3 structure calculation 2.46 Xplor-NIH G. Marius Clore, Guillermo Bermejo, John Kuszewski, Charles D. Schwieters, and Nico Tjandra
4 chemical shift assignment ? Sparky Goddard
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback