SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
2 2D 1H-13C HSQC aliphatic 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
3 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
4 3D CBCA(CO)NH 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
5 3D HNCACB 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
7 3D HNCA 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
6 3D HNCO 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
10 3D HBHA(CO)NH 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
9 3D HN(CO)CA 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
8 3D HCCH-TOCSY 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
12 3D 1H-15N NOESY 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
11 3D HCCH-COSY 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
14 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
13 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic 600 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Fag s 1, 10 mM sodium phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, 5 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 10 % [U-100% 2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.187 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.8 1 308
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 3
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 400
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment 2.4.1 Analysis CcpNmr Analysis was primarily written by Wayne Boucher and Tim Stevens at the University of Cambridge
2 structure calculation 2.3.1 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
3 structure calculation 1.3.1 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4 peak picking 2.4.1 Analysis CCPN