SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
2 3D HNCACB 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
3 3D CBCA(CO)NH 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
4 3D HBHA(CO)NH 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
5 3D 1H-15N NOESY 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
6 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
7 3D HNCO 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
8 3D HNCA 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
9 3D HN(CO)CA 100 uM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] Arabidopsis thaliana phloem protein 16-1, 90% H2O/10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 4.2 1 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement ? CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
2 structure calculation ? CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
3 chemical shift assignment ? XEASY Bartels et al.
4 peak picking ? XEASY Bartels et al.
5 collection ? TopSpin Bruker Biospin
6 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
7 data analysis ? Sparky Goddard
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback