SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 1.5 mM Ocellatin-LB1, 400 mM d38 DPC, 5 % 99.75% D2O, trifluoroethanol/water Null trifluoroethanol/water 4 ambient 273.15
2 2D 1H-1H NOESY 1.5 mM Ocellatin-LB1, 400 mM d38 DPC, 5 % 99.75% D2O, trifluoroethanol/water Null trifluoroethanol/water 4 ambient 273.15
3 2D 1H-15N HSQC 1.5 mM Ocellatin-LB1, 400 mM d38 DPC, 5 % 99.75% D2O, trifluoroethanol/water Null trifluoroethanol/water 4 ambient 273.15
4 2D 1H-13C HSQC 1.5 mM Ocellatin-LB1, 400 mM d38 DPC, 5 % 99.75% D2O, trifluoroethanol/water Null trifluoroethanol/water 4 ambient 273.15
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE III 800
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 7
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection ? XwinNMR Bruker Biospin
2 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
3 chemical shift assignment ? NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
4 data analysis ? NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
5 data analysis ? Procheck Laskowski, MacArthur, Smith, Jones, Hutchinson, Morris, Moss and Thornton
6 data analysis ? MOLMOL Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
7 refinement 2.27 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
8 structure calculation 2.27 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
9 geometry optimization 2.27 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback