| simulated annealing |
THE STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL OF NILGES ET AL. (1988) FEBS LETT. 229, 129-136 USING THE PROGRAM CNS MODIFIED TO INCORPORATE COUPLING CONSTANT RESTRAINTS (GARRETT ET AL. (1984) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 104, 99-103), CARBON CHEMICAL SHIFT RESTRAINTS, (KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1995) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 106, 92-96) RESTRAINTS, AND RESIDUAL DIPOLAR COUPLING RESTRAINTS (CLORE ET AL. J. MAGN. RESON 131, 159-162 (1998); J. MAGN 133, 216-221 (1998)).
IN THIS ENTRY THE LAST COLUMN REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE RMS
DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL SIMULATED ANNEALING
STRUCTURES AND THE MEAN COORDINATE POSITIONS. THE LAST
COLUMN IN THE INDIVIDUAL SA STRUCTURES HAS NO MEANING. BEST
FITTING TO GENERATE THE AVERAGE STRUCTURE IS WITH RESPECT
TO RESIDUES 1 - 250
(RESIDUES 251 - 259 ARE DISORDERED IN SOLUTION) OF ENZYME I
AND RESIDUES 301-385 OF HPR. RESIDUES 251-259 ARE OMITTED
FROM THE MEAN STRUCTURE |
1 |
