SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing THE STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SIMULATED ANNEALING PROTOCOL OF NILGES ET AL. (1988) FEBS LETT. 229, 129-136 USING THE PROGRAM CNS MODIFIED TO INCORPORATE COUPLING CONSTANT RESTRAINTS (GARRETT ET AL. (1984) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 104, 99-103), CARBON CHEMICAL SHIFT RESTRAINTS, (KUSZEWSKI ET AL. (1995) J. MAGN. RESON. SERIES B 106, 92-96) RESTRAINTS, AND RESIDUAL DIPOLAR COUPLING RESTRAINTS (CLORE ET AL. J. MAGN. RESON 131, 159-162 (1998); J. MAGN 133, 216-221(1998)). IN THIS ENTRY THE LAST COLUMN REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE RMS DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE INDIVIDUAL SIMULATED ANNEALING STRUCTURES AND THE MEAN COORDINATE POSITIONS. THE LAST COLUMN IN THE INDIVIDUAL SA STRUCTURES HAS NO MEANING. FITTING TO GENERATE THE AVERAGE STRUCTURE IS WITH RESPECT BEST TO RESIDUES 1 - 250 (RESIDUES 251 - 249 ARE DISORDERED IN SOLUTION) OF ENZYME I AND RESIDUES 1-85 OF HPR. RESIDUES 251-249 ARE OMITTED FROM THE MEAN STRUCTURE. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria REGULARIZED MEAN STRUCTURE
Conformers Calculated Total Number 40
Conformers Submitted Total Number 1
Representative Model ()
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement ? CNS BRUNGER, ADAMS, CLORE, DELANO, GROSSE-KUNSTLEVE,JIANG,KUSZEWSKI,NILGES, PANNU,READ,RICE,SIMONSON,WARREN
2 structure solution ABOVE) CNS (SEE ABOVE) ?
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback