SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
2 2D 1H-13C HSQC 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
3 3D CBCA(CO)NH 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
4 3D C(CO)NH 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
5 3D HNCO 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
6 3D HNCACB 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
7 3D HBHA(CO)NH 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
8 3D 1H-15N NOESY 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
9 3D 1H-13C NOESY aliphatic 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
10 3D 1H-13C NOESY aromatic 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
11 1H-15N Heteronuclear NOE 25 mM TRIS, 150 mM sodium chloride, 10 % [U-2H] D2O, 90% H2O/10% D2O 0.15 90% H2O/10% D2O 8 ambient 303
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Varian INOVA 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
2 collection ? VnmrJ Varian
3 chemical shift assignment ? CcpNmr Analysis Wim F. Vranken, Wayne Boucher, Tim J. Stevens, Rasmus H. Fogh,
4 structure solution 1.3 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
5 refinement 1.3 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback