SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
2 2D 1H-13C HSQC 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
3 3D HNCO 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
4 3D CBCA(CO)NH 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
5 3D HNCACB 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
6 3D 1H-13C NOESY 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
7 3D 1H-15N NOESY 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
8 3D HCCH-TOCSY 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
9 3D (h)NNH HSQC-NOESY-HSQC 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
10 3D (h)CCH HSQC-NOESY-HSQC 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
11 3D (h)CNH HSQC-NOESY-HSQC 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
12 3D (h)NCH HSQC-NOESY-HSQC 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
13 2D 1H-13C HSQC 1.05 mM ER690.005, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.2 ambient 310
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE 800
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing, molecular dynamics ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement ? CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2 structure solution ? CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
3 geometry optimization ? CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
4 refinement 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5 geometry optimization 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6 structure solution 3.0 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7 data analysis 2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
8 refinement 2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
9 data analysis 2.1 AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
10 chemical shift assignment 2.1 AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
11 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
12 data analysis ? XEASY Bartels et al.
13 peak picking ? XEASY Bartels et al.
14 chemical shift assignment ? XEASY Bartels et al.
15 collection ? TopSpin Bruker Biospin
16 collection ? VnmrJ Varian
17 chemical shift assignment ? PINE Bahrami, Markley, Assadi, and Eghbalnia
18 data analysis ? Sparky Goddard
19 geometry optimization ? TALOS+ Shen, Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
20 geometry optimization ? PALES PALES (Zweckstetter, Bax)
21 geometry optimization ? REDCAT Valafar, Prestegard
22 structure validation ? PSVS Bhattacharya, Montelione
23 refinement ? Rosetta Baker