SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY .515 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Human Chemokine CCL19, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 25 mM [U-100% 2H] dueterated MES, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 6 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.6 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY .515 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Human Chemokine CCL19, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 25 mM [U-100% 2H] dueterated MES, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 6 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.6 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) .515 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Human Chemokine CCL19, 10 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 25 mM [U-100% 2H] dueterated MES, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 6 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.6 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker DRX 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT, AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT CCL19 STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 2481 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 1559 INTRA, 398 SEQUENTIAL, 171 MEDIUM, 353 LONG RANGE) AND 85 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS., CCL19 STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 2481 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 1559 INTRA, 398 SEQUENTIAL, 171 MEDIUM, 353 LONG RANGE) AND 85 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2 collection 3.1 TopSpin Bruker
3 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
4 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 data analysis 1.8.4 CARA Keller, R.
7 refinement 3.1 CYANA Guntert, P.
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback