SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 10 mM [U-100% 2H] imidazole, 150 mM sodium chloride, 95 % H2O, 5 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 95% H2O/5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.1 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 10 mM [U-100% 2H] imidazole, 150 mM sodium chloride, 95 % H2O, 5 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 95% H2O/5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.1 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 10 mM [U-100% 2H] imidazole, 150 mM sodium chloride, 95 % H2O, 5 % [U-99% 2H] D2O, 95% H2O/5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.1 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT. STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1800 NOE CONSTRAINTS (338 INTRA, 465 SEQUENTIAL, 260 MEDIUM, AND 730 LONG RANGE) AND 130 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker
3 processing 2009 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
4 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.
7 refinement 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback