SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 2 mM lucifensin, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 5 % D2O, 15 uM TSP, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.0 ambient 298.15
2 2D 1H-1H NOESY 2 mM lucifensin, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 5 % D2O, 15 uM TSP, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.0 ambient 298.15
3 2D DQF-COSY 2 mM lucifensin, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 5 % D2O, 15 uM TSP, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.0 ambient 298.15
4 2D 1H-13C HSQC 2 mM lucifensin, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 5 % D2O, 15 uM TSP, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.0 ambient 298.15
5 2D 1H-13C HSQC aromatic 2 mM lucifensin, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 5 % D2O, 15 uM TSP, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.0 ambient 298.15
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing, molecular dynamics First, in vacuo refinement with the NOVA force field, then refinement in explicit water with the YASARA force field 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker Biospin
2 processing 2.1 TopSpin Bruker Biospin
3 chemical shift assignment 1.8.4 CARA Keller and Wuthrich
4 data analysis 1.8.4 CARA Keller and Wuthrich
5 peak picking 1.8.4 CARA Keller and Wuthrich
6 structure solution 2.1 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
7 geometry optimization 2.1 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
8 geometry optimization ? TALOS+ Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
9 refinement 11.5.21 YASARA Elmar Krieger
10 structure validation ? ProcheckNMR Laskowski and MacArthur