SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 2.9 mM WALP19-P8, 233 mM [U-100% 2H] SDS, 3.4 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 88.3 % H2O, 8.3 % D2O, 32 uM potassium phosphate, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 ? 328
2 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 2.9 mM WALP19-P8, 233 mM [U-100% 2H] SDS, 3.4 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 88.3 % H2O, 8.3 % D2O, 32 uM potassium phosphate, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 ? 328
3 2D 1H-1H NOESY 2.9 mM WALP19-P8, 233 mM [U-100% 2H] SDS, 3.4 % [U-100% 2H] TFE, 88.3 % H2O, 8.3 % D2O, 32 uM potassium phosphate, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 ? 328
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE 500
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker Biospin
2 processing 2.1 TopSpin Bruker Biospin
3 chemical shift assignment 3.114 Sparky Goddard
4 data analysis 3.114 Sparky Goddard
5 geometry optimization 2.24 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
6 structure solution 2.24 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
7 data analysis 1.3 PSVS Bhattacharya and Montelione
8 refinement 2.24 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore