SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Par-6, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 53 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.5 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Par-6, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 53 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.5 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] Par-6, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 53 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.5 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE II 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
torsion angle dynamics AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENTSTRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1604 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 407 INTRA, 388 SEQUENTIAL, 251 MEDIUM, AND 558 LONG RANGE) AND 165 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS., STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1604 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 407 INTRA, 388 SEQUENTIAL, 251 MEDIUM, AND 558 LONG RANGE) AND 165 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker
3 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
4 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback