SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
2 3D HNCACB 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
3 3D HN(COCA)CB 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
4 3D HSQC-TOCSY 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
5 3D HCCH-TOCSY 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
6 2D aromatic 1H-13C HSQC 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
7 2D aromatic 13C-edited NOESY 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
8 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
9 2D 1H-1H NOESY 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
10 3D 1H-15N NOESY 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
11 3D 1H-13C NOESY 25 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride, 1-1.5 mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ERp27 b domain, 90% H2O/10% D2O ? 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.5 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 50
Representative Model 1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 structure solution 1.2 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
2 chemical shift assignment 2.1 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
3 refinement ? TALOS Cornilescu, Delaglio and Bax
4 peak picking ? CCPN_Analysis CCPN
5 data analysis ? CCPN_Analysis CCPN
6 chemical shift assignment ? CCPN_Analysis CCPN
7 validation ? ProcheckNMR Laskowski and MacArthur
8 data analysis ? ProcheckNMR Laskowski and MacArthur
9 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
10 peak picking ? NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
11 chemical shift assignment ? NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific