SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] PlyG, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] Bis-Tris, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 13 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 AMBIENT 303
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] PlyG, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] Bis-Tris, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 13 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 AMBIENT 303
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] PlyG, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] Bis-Tris, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 13 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 AMBIENT 303
4 ? 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] PlyG, 10 mM [U-99% 2H] Bis-Tris, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 13 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 AMBIENT 303
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker DRX 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 3503 NOE CONSTRAINTS (634 INTRA, 594 SEQUENTIAL, 750 MEDIUM and 1525 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS) AND 216 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker
3 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
4 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.