SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC
2 2D 1H-13C HSQC
3 3D CBCA(CO)NH
4 3D HNCACB
5 3D HBHA(CO)NH
6 3D HNCO
7 3D HCCH-TOCSY
8 3D 1H-15N NOESY
9 3D 1H-13C NOESY
10 2D 1H-15N HSQC
11 2D 1H-13C HSQC
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing The structure was determined using triple resonance NMR spectroscopy. Automated backbone assignments were made using Autoassign. Sidechain assignments were completed manually. Automated NOESY assignments were made using AutoStructure and structure solution was obtained using AutoStructure and CYANA-2.1. 150 structures were calculated and 20 best structures were refined in a shell of water using CNS. Initial dihedral angles were obtained using TALOS. The structure calculations were done including the N-terminal 6xHis tag. Resonance assignments were validated using AVS validation software. Final quality scores were determined using PSVS software. Ordered residues are defined as:11-13,18-54,62-77 . RMSD(ordered residuesall backbone aatoms 0.9A; All heavy atoms 1.4A; Ramachandran Statistics for all ordered residues: Most favoured 94.6%, additionally allowed region: 5.4%; Procheck scores for all ordered residues (Raw/Z) phi-psi 0.09/0.67; All dihedral angles 0.04/0.24; MolProbity clash score (Raw/Z) 13.00/-0.71. RPF scores for the goodness of fir of the structure to the NMR data: recall:0.933; Precision 0.918; F-measure 0.926 and final DP score: 0.768 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 150
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 chemical shift assignment 2.2.1 AutoAssign Zimmerman, Moseley, Kulikowski and Montelione
2 chemical shift assignment 2.2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
3 structure solution 2.2.1 AutoStructure Huang, Tejero, Powers and Montelione
4 geometry optimization 2.1 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
5 structure solution 2.1 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
6 refinement 2.0.6 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read
7 geometry optimization 2.0.6 CNS Brunger, Adams, Clore, Gros, Nilges and Read