SOLUTION NMR


NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D NOESY 400-800 uM [U-2H] RNA (65-MER), 100% D2O 80 100% D2O 7.0 ambient 310
2 2D NOESY 400-800 uM [U-2H] RNA (65-MER), 100% D2O 80 100% D2O 7.0 ambient 310
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
distance geometry Structures were calculated and refined with CYANA using the AMBER residue library. Upper-limit distance restraints of 2.7 , 3.3 and 5.0 were employed for direct NOE cross peaks of strong, medium and weak intensities, respectively, for all cross peaks except those associated with the intraresidue H8/6-to-H2 and H3 interactions. For these proton pairs, upper distance limits of 4.2 and 3.2 were therefore employed for NOEs of medium and strong intensity, respectively.43 Cross-helix P-P distance restraints (with 20% weighting coefficient) were employed for A-form helical segments to prevent the generation of structures with collapsed major grooves:43,52,55 P(i)-P(i+2) (cross-helix phosphorus of the i+2 base pair) = 16.1 - 17.1 , P(i)-P(i+3) = 14.2 - 15.2 ; P(i)-P(i+4) = 11.7 -12.7 ; P(i)-P(i+5) = 9.4 -10.4 ; P(i)-P(i+6) = 9.0 -10.0 . Torsion angle restraints for A helical stem residues were centered around published A-form RNA values 112 with allowed deviations of 50 degrees. Four restraints per hydrogen bond were employed to enforce approximately linear NH-N and NH-O bond distances of 1.85 0.05, and two lower limit restraints per base pair were employed to weakly enforce base pair planarity (20% weighting coefficient) (G-C base pairs: G-C4 to C-C6 > 8.3 and G-N9 to C-H6 > 10.75 . A-U base pairs: A-C4 to U-C6 > 8.3 and A-N9 to U-H6 > 10.75 ). 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 340
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 structure solution 2.1 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
2 refinement 2.1 CYANA Guntert, Mumenthaler and Wuthrich
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback