SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CI-MPR domain5-1, 10 mM [U-2H] bis-tris-2, 150 mM sodium chloride-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.5 AMBIENT 308
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CI-MPR domain5-1, 10 mM [U-2H] bis-tris-2, 150 mM sodium chloride-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.5 AMBIENT 308
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CI-MPR domain5-1, 10 mM [U-2H] bis-tris-2, 150 mM sodium chloride-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O 150 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.5 AMBIENT 308
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 2050 NOE CONSTRAINTS (439 INTRA, 434 SEQUENTIAL, 182 MEDIUM, and 995 LONG RANGE) AND 165 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker
3 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
4 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.