SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 0.8 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AL-09 H87Y-1, 10 mM [U-2H] MES-2, 0.02 % sodium azide-3, 95% H2O, 5% D2O 8 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.8 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 0.8 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AL-09 H87Y-1, 10 mM [U-2H] MES-2, 0.02 % sodium azide-3, 95% H2O, 5% D2O 8 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.8 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 0.8 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] AL-09 H87Y-1, 10 mM [U-2H] MES-2, 0.02 % sodium azide-3, 95% H2O, 5% D2O 8 95% H2O/5% D2O 6.8 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE III 500
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT HOMODIMER STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 2104 NOE CONSTRAINTS (341 INTRA, 394 SEQUENTIAL, 265 MEDIUM, 1027 INTRAMONOMER LONG RANGE AND 77 INTERMONOMER NOE CONSTRAINTS) AND 149 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS PER MONOMER. CONSTRAINTS WERE ASSIGNED AND VALIDATED IN ONE MONOMER AND THEN DUPLICATED TO GENERATE A SYMMETRY RELATED CONSTRAINTS IN THE SECOND MONOMER. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker
3 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
4 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.