SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
2 3D CBCA(CO)NH 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
3 3D HNCACB 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
4 3D HCCH-TOCSY 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
5 3D 1H-15N NOESY 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
6 3D 1H-13C NOESY 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
7 2D 13C,15N Filtered NOESY 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
8 2D 13C,15N Filtered TOCSY 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
9 2D F2 13C Filtered NOESY 50mM potassium phosphate-1, 0.5mM sodium azide-2, 1mM 2-octenoyl phosphopantetheine-3, 1mM [U-99% 13C; U-99% 15N] ACP-4, 95% H2O/5% D2O 50 95% H2O/5% D2O 7.0 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing 20 best structures from last iteration were selected for water refinement. Water refined structures were calculated using the slightly modified refinement script applied to the RECOORD database. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 1.2 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue,Nilges
2 structure solution 1.2 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue, Nilges
3 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
4 data analysis 1.0 CCPN_Analysis Fogh, Vranken, Boucher, Stevens, Laue
5 peak picking 1.0 CCPN_Analysis Fogh, Vranken, Boucher, Stevens, Laue
6 chemical shift assignment 1.0 CCPN_Analysis Fogh, Vranken, Boucher, Stevens, Laue