SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 3.3 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SDF1a H25R, 25 mM [U-99% 2H] MES, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.8 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 3.3 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SDF1a H25R, 25 mM [U-99% 2H] MES, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.8 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 3.3 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] SDF1a H25R, 25 mM [U-99% 2H] MES, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 20 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.8 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker DRX 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1430 NOE CONSTRAINTS (339 INTRA, 388 SEQUENTIAL, 263 MEDIUM, AND 440 LONG RANGE) AND 65 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker
2 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
3 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
4 data analysis 1.1.0 SPSCAN R.W. Glaser
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.
7 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.