SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] mPar3 PDZ2, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 54 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] mPar3 PDZ2, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 54 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 1 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] mPar3 PDZ2, 20 mM sodium phosphate, 50 mM sodium chloride, 0.02 % sodium azide, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 54 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.0 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE II 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1307 NOE CONSTRAINTS (219 INTRA, 388 SEQUENTIAL, 209 MEDIUM, AND 491 LONG RANGE) AND 117 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection 2.1 TopSpin Bruker
2 processing 2007 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
3 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
4 data analysis 1.1.0 SPSCAN R.W. Glaser
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.
7 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.