SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-15N HSQC 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
2 3D CBCA(CO)NH 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
3 3D HNCACB 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
4 3D H(CCO)NH 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
5 3D C(CO)NH 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
6 3D HCCH-TOCSY 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
7 3D HNCO 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
8 3D HNHA 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
9 3D 1H-15N NOESY 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
10 3D 1H-13C NOESY 1-2 mM [U-98% 13C; U-98% 15N] Acyl Carrier Protein-1, 20 mM potassium phosphate-2, 1 mM sodium azide-3, 95% H2O/5% D2O ? 95% H2O/5% D2O 5.5 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Varian INOVA 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ALL STRUCTURE CALCULATIONS WERE CARRIED OUT USING THE AMBIGUOUS RESTRAINTS FOR ITERATIVE ASSIGNMENT OF NOES (ARIA) PROTOCOL VERSION 1.2. THE 20 BEST STRUCTURES (SORTED ACCORDING TO TOTAL ENERGY) WERE SELECTED FOR WATER REFINEMENT. WATER REFINED STRUCTURES WERE CALCULATED USING THE SLIGHTLY MODIFIED REFINEMENT SCRIPT APPLIED TO THE RECOORD DATABASE. PROCHECK AND WHATCHECK AND QUALITY INDICATORS WERE COMPARED TO THE AVERAGE VALUES FOR THE RECOORD DATABASE OF PROTEIN NMR STRUCTURES. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 structure solution 1.2 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
2 refinement 1.2 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
3 peak picking 1.2 ARIA Linge, O'Donoghue and Nilges
4 chemical shift assignment 1.0 ANALYSIS Tim Stevens, Wayne Boucher (CCPN)
5 data analysis 1.0 ANALYSIS Tim Stevens, Wayne Boucher (CCPN)
6 peak picking 1.0 ANALYSIS Tim Stevens, Wayne Boucher (CCPN)
7 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax