SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1.56 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CXCL12/SDF1-alpha, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.5 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1.56 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CXCL12/SDF1-alpha, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.5 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 1.56 mM [U-100% 13C; U-100% 15N] CXCL12/SDF1-alpha, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 50 90% H2O/10% D2O 5.5 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
molecular dynamics AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. FINAL STRUCTURES WERE OBTAINED BY MOLECULAR DYNAMICS IN EXPLICIT SOLVENT, CXCL12 STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1196 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 336 INTRA, 251 SEQUENTIAL, 218 MEDIUM, 391 LONG RANGE) AND 72 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 refinement 2.9.3 Xplor-NIH SCHWIETERS,C.D.,KUSZEWSKI,J.J.,TJANDRA,N.,CLORE,G.M.
2 collection 3.5 XwinNMR Bruker
3 processing 2004 NMRPipe Delagio,F. et al.
4 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Eccles, C., Guntert, P., Billeter, M., Wuthrich, K.
5 data analysis 2.1 GARANT C. Bartels
6 structural calculation 2.1 CYANA Guntert, P.