SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 4.0 mM Phylloseptin-1, trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) ? trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) 7.0 ambient 293
2 2D 1H-1H NOESY 4.0 mM Phylloseptin-1, trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) ? trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) 7.0 ambient 293
3 2D 1H-13C HSQC 4.0 mM Phylloseptin-1, trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) ? trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) 7.0 ambient 293
4 2D 1H-15N HSQC 4.0 mM Phylloseptin-1, trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) ? trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) 7.0 ambient 293
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE DRX 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection ? XwinNMR Bruker Biospin
2 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
3 chemical shift assignment 5.0.4 NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
4 data analysis 5.0.4 NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
5 geometry optimization 2.17.0 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
6 structure solution 2.17.0 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
7 refinement 2.17.0 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
8 data analysis 2k.2 MOLMOL Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
9 data analysis 3.5.4 Procheck Laskowski, MacArthur, Smith, Jones, Hutchinson, Morris, Moss, and Thornton
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback