Planned Maintenance: Some services may turn out to be unavailable from 15th January, 2026 to 16th January, 2026. We apologize for the inconvenience!

SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 2D 1H-1H TOCSY 4.0 mM Phylloseptin-2, trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) ? trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) 7.0 ambient 293
2 2D 1H-1H NOESY 4.0 mM Phylloseptin-2, trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) ? trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) 7.0 ambient 293
3 2D 1H-13C HSQC 4.0 mM Phylloseptin-2, trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) ? trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) 7.0 ambient 293
4 2D 1H-15N HSQC 4.0 mM Phylloseptin-2, trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) ? trifluoroethanol/water (60%/40%) 7.0 ambient 293
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker AVANCE DRX 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
simulated annealing ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 200
Conformers Submitted Total Number 10
Representative Model 1 (closest to the average)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection ? XwinNMR Bruker Biospin
2 processing ? NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek, Vuister, Zhu, Pfeifer and Bax
3 chemical shift assignment 5.0.4 NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
4 data analysis 5.0.4 NMRView Johnson, One Moon Scientific
5 geometry optimization 2.17.0 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
6 structure solution 2.17.0 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
7 refinement 2.17.0 X-PLOR NIH Schwieters, Kuszewski, Tjandra and Clore
8 data analysis 2k.2 MOLMOL Koradi, Billeter and Wuthrich
9 data analysis 3.5.4 Procheck Laskowski, MacArthur, Smith, Jones, Hutchinson, Morris, Moss and Thornton
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback