SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 1H-15N-1H NOESY-HSQC 0.5mM CaM2/3 U-15N,13C; 20 mM Tris d11, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 90% H2O, and 10% D2O 50 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298
2 simultaneous 1H-13C/15N-1H NOESY-HSQC 0.5mM CaM2/3 U-15N,13C; 20 mM Tris d11, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 90% H2O, and 10% D2O 50 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298
3 aromatic 1H-13C-1H NOESY-HSQC 0.5mM CaM2/3 U-15N,13C; 20 mM Tris d11, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 90% H2O, and 10% D2O 50 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298
4 methyl 1H-13C/15N-1H NOESY-HSQC 0.5mM CaM2/3 U-15N,13C; 20 mM Tris d11, 50 mM KCl, 10 mM CaCl2, 90% H2O, and 10% D2O 50 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 7.4 ambient 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
Restrained molecular dynamics, simulated annealing ? 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria structures with the least restraint violations,structures with the lowest energy
Conformers Calculated Total Number 50
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 structure solution 1.1 CNS BRUNGER,ADAMS,CLORE,DELANO,GROS,GROSSE-KUNSTLEVE,JIANG,KUSZEWSKI,NILGES,PANNU,READ,RICE,SIMONSON,WARREN
2 structure solution 1.2 ARIA Linge, Habeck et al. 2003
3 processing 2000 Felix Accelrys, Inc.
4 processing 2006 NMRPipe Delaglio, Grzesiek et al. 1995
5 data analysis 3.111 Sparky Goddard and Kneeler 1999
6 refinement 1.2 ARIA Linge, Habeck et al. 2003
7 refinement 1.1 CNS BRUNGER,ADAMS,CLORE,DELANO,GROS,GROSSE-KUNSTLEVE,JIANG,KUSZEWSKI,NILGES,PANNU,READ,RICE,SIMONSON,WARREN
Feedback Form
Name
Email
Institute
Feedback