SOLUTION NMR

NMR Experiment
Experiment Type Sample Contents Ionic Strength Solvent pH Pressure Temprature (K)
1 3D_15N-separated_NOESY 1 mM CC3 hLtn, U-15N, 13C; 20 mM phospate buffer, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 10 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 AMBIENT 298
2 3D_13C-separated_NOESY 1 mM CC3 hLtn, U-15N, 13C; 20 mM phospate buffer, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 10 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 AMBIENT 298
3 3D_13C-separated_NOESY (AROMATIC) 1 mM CC3 hLtn, U-15N, 13C; 20 mM phospate buffer, 90% H2O, 10% D2O 10 mM 90% H2O/10% D2O 6.0 AMBIENT 298
NMR Spectrometer Information
Spectrometer Manufacturer Model Field Strength
1 Bruker DRX 600
NMR Refinement
Method Details Software
AUTOMATED METHODS WERE USED FOR BACKBONE CHEMICAL SHIFT ASSIGNMENT AND ITERATIVE NOE REFINEMENT. STRUCTURES ARE BASED ON A TOTAL OF 1234 NOE CONSTRAINTS ( 418 INTRA, 333 SEQUENTIAL, 153 MEDIUM and 330 LONG RANGE CONSTRAINTS) AND 82 PHI AND PSI DIHEDRAL ANGLE CONSTRAINTS. 1
NMR Ensemble Information
Conformer Selection Criteria target function
Conformers Calculated Total Number 100
Conformers Submitted Total Number 20
Representative Model 1 (lowest energy)
Computation: NMR Software
# Classification Version Software Name Author
1 collection 3.5 XwinNMR ?
2 processing 2004 NMRPipe Delaglio, F., Grzesiek, S., Vuister, G.W., Zhu, G., Pfeifer, J., Bax, A.
3 data analysis 1.3 XEASY Bartels, C, Xia, T.-H., Billeter, M., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
4 data analysis 2.1 GARANT Bartels, C., Billeter, M., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
5 structure solution 2.1 CYANA Herrmann, T., Guntert, P., Wuthrich, K.
6 refinement 2.9.3 XPLOR-NIH Schwieters, C.D., Kuszewski, J.J, Tjandra, N., Clore, G.M.